Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2632/2026 of THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (MECH), PWRD, JORHAT MECHANICAL DIVISION Vs SMT. RAJU BORA AND 3 ORS on 12 October 2026
GAHC010160842026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2632/2026 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (MECH), PWRD, JORHAT MECHANICAL DIVISION JORHAT, (EARLIER THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD (R AND B), MECHANICAL DIVISION, JORHAT, GOVT. OF
GAHC010160842026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2632/2026
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (MECH), PWRD, JORHAT MECHANICAL
DIVISION
JORHAT, (EARLIER THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD (R AND B), MECHANICAL DIVISION, JORHAT, GOVT. OF ASSAM)
VERSUS
SMT. RAJU BORA AND 3 ORS
W/O LATE NAREN BORAH, RESIDENT OF CHARIGAON, 2 NO.
TUKURIGAON, P.O.- SENGALIGAON, P.S.- JORHAT, DISTRICT- JORHAT, ASSAM
2:SAURAV BORA
S/O LATE NAREN BORAH
RESIDENT OF CHARIGAON
2 NO. TUKURIGAON
P.O.- SENGALIGAON
P.S.- JORHAT
DISTRICT- JORHAT
ASSAM
3:RINKU MONI BORA
S/O LATE NAREN BORAH
RESIDENT OF CHARIGAON
2 NO. TUKURIGAON
P.O.- SENGALIGAON
P.S.- JORHAT
DISTRICT- JORHAT
ASSAM
4:RANJAN DUTTA
S/O GHANA KANTA DUTTA
VILL- NARAHALIADHARI GAON
P.O.- LAHDOIGARH
DIST- JORHAT
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D NATH, MS. N BARMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.10.2026
1. Heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Counsel for the applicant.
2. On perusal of the office note dated 12.10.2026, it appears that the notices issued to all the respondents have been duly delivered. As such, the notices are held to be duly served.
3. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed by the applicant for condoning the delay of 4 days in preferring the connected MAC appeal.
4. The learned Senior Government Counsel has submitted that the said delay has been explained in Paragraph Nos. (i) to (vii) of the instant interlocutory application.
5. After considering the said reasons, this Court is of the considered opinion that the delay in approaching the Court belatedly has been sufficiently explained by the applicant. As such, the delay of 4 days in preferring the MAC Appeal is hereby condoned and this interlocutory application is allowed.
6. The Registry is directed to register the connected MAC Appeal and list the same for admission hearing on 15th of October, 2026.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant