Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3393/2026 of JASMIN SULTANA AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010209192026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3393/2026 JASMIN SULTANA AND ANR D/O-NASIR UDDIN AHMED, AGE ABOUT-48YEARSVILL-BANGARIGURI PAM, P/O-JAJORI, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAMPIN-782442 2: ABDUL HAI AHMED

GAHC010209192026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3393/2026

JASMIN SULTANA AND ANR

D/O-NASIR UDDIN AHMED, AGE ABOUT-48YEARSVILL-BANGARIGURI

PAM, P/O-JAJORI, DIST-NAGAON, ASSAMPIN-782442

2: ABDUL HAI AHMED

S/O-ABDUL KHALEQUE

R/O-MANIKUR

P/O-KRISHNAI

DIST-GOWALAPARAPIN-783126

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWWHATI-06.

2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-06.3. THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

ASSAM.

3:THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-06

4:THE RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSA ABHIYAN RMSA

REPRESENTED BY ITS MISSION DIRECTOR

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-1

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MS. J GOGOI,MR. A KHANDAKAR,MR P J

DUTTA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, FINANCE DEPTT.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.10.2026 Heard Ms. J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant. 2] This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the two applicants being applicant No.1 namely Jasmin Sultana and applicant No.2 namely Abdul Hai Ahmed, who are the writ petitioners Nos. 40 & 44 in the accompanying writ petition being WP(C) No.4795/2024. 3] The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants being the writ petitioners Nos. 40 & 44 in WP(C) No.4795/2024 do not wish to pursue the said writ petition and therefore, they want their names to be deleted from the array of writ petitioners in WP(C) No.4795/2024. 4] Ms. P. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education does not object to the prayer made. 5] Accordingly, taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The names of the applicants being applicant No.1 namely Jasmin Sultana and applicant No.2 namely Abdul Hai Ahmed stand deleted from the array of the writ petitioners in WP(C) No.4795/2024. 6] This interlocutory applicant stands disposed of. 7] The petitioners will file the amended cause title before the Registry in WP(C) No.4795/2024. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead