Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1129/2026 of PHANI CHANDRA DAS Vs SUNIL DAS AND ANR. on 12 October 2026
GAHC010067092026 2026:GAU-AS:15443 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1129/2026 PHANI CHANDRA DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKHATA, MOUZA PUB BAKSA, PS- TAMULPUR, DISTRICT- BAKSA, PIN-781367 VERSUS SUNIL DAS AND ANR. SON OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010067092026
2026:GAU-AS:15443
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1129/2026
PHANI CHANDRA DAS
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKHATA, MOUZA PUB BAKSA, PS- TAMULPUR, DISTRICT- BAKSA, PIN-781367
VERSUS
SUNIL DAS AND ANR.
SON OF LATE ROMESH DAS
2:SRI SUBHASH DAS
SON OF LATE ROMESH DAS
BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARKHATA
MOUZA PUB BAKSA
PS- TAMULPUR
DIST- BAKSA PIN-78136
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GHOSH, MR. A ROSHID,MS F AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : MS F BEGUM, MR A HOSSAIN,MR. J I BORBHUIYA
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.10.2026 Learned counsel Mr. S.K. Ghosh is present for the applicant Phani Chandra Das who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act Page No.# 2/2 with prayer for condonation of delay of three days in filing the connected review petition.
2. Ms. F. Begum, learned counsel is present for the respondents and has submitted that she has no objection if the delay is condoned.
3. I have considered the submissions at the Bar.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant obtained the certified copy of the judgment and he had withdrawn the brief from the earlier engaged counsel. Thereafter, the present engaged counsel took two days’ time in preparing the review petition which resulted in the delay. Sufficient grounds have been shown. No malafide is discernible. Thereby, the prayer for condonation of delay of three days in filing the connected review petition is hereby allowed.
5. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
6. Registry to register the connected review petition and list the same on 05.11.2026.
7. Applicant shall furnish the copy of review petition to the respondents.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant