Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3708/2026 of SADGURU ENGINEERS AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD. Vs YOJANA BAJORIA AND ORS on 12 October 2026
GAHC010231812026 2026:GAU-AS:15482 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3708/2026 SADGURU ENGINEERS AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 AND EXISTING UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013
GAHC010231812026
2026:GAU-AS:15482
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3708/2026
SADGURU ENGINEERS AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD.
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 AND
EXISTING UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT HANUMAN TOWEER 406 4TH FLOOR SATI JAYMATI ROAD
ATHGAON GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 781001 REPRESENTED
HEREIN THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, MR. MUKESH JALAN
VERSUS
YOJANA BAJORIA AND ORS
WIFE OF RAJESH BAJORIA RESIDENT OF B 3 KAILASK APARTMENT HS
ROAD PALTAN BAZAR REHABARI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM GUWAHATI
781008 ASSAM BEING THE FINANCIAL CREDITOR APPLICANT IN CP
IB/11/GB/2026
2:NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH
THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR BSNL
BHAWAN BUILDING ANANDA RAM BARUAH ROAD PAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI 781001 PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM BEING THE
ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY WHICH HAS PASSED THE ORDER IMPUGNED
HEREIN
3:UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MKINISTRY
OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS SHASTRI BHAWAN DR RAJENDRA PRASAD
BHAWAN DR RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD NEW DELHI 110001 BEING THE
AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSOLVENCY
AND BANKRUPTCY CODE
216 AND CONSTITUTION OF THE NATIONAL CO. LAW TRIBUNA
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. ASHOK SARAF, MR. A. KAUSHIK,MR P K BORA,MR. N N
DUTTA,MR P BARUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, C.G.C., Linked Case : WP(C)/5086/2026
SADGURU ENGINEERS AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT LTD
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 AND
EXISTING UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT HANUMAN TOWER 406
4TH FLOOR
SATI JAYMATI ROAD
ATHGAON GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 781001 REPRESENTED
HEREIN THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
MR MUKESH JALAN
VERSUS
YOJANA BAJORIA AND 2 ORS
WIFE OF RAJESH BAJORIA RESIDENT OF B 3 KAILASH APARTMENT HS
ROAD PALTAN BAZAR REHABARI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM GUWAHATI
781008 ASSAM BEING THE FINANCIAL CREDITOR APPLICANT IN
CP(IB)/11/GB/2026
2:NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
GUWAHATI BENCH
THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR BSNL
BHAWAN BUILDING
ANANDA RAM BARUAH ROAD
PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM
BEING THE ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY WHICH HAS PASSED THE ORDER
IMPUGNED HEREIN
3:UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF
CORPORATE AFFAIRS
SHASTRI BHAWAN DR RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD NEW DELHI 110001
BEING THE AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE 2016 AND CONSTITUTION OF THE
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL.
------------
Advocate for : DR. ASHOK SARAF
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for YOJANA BAJORIA AND 2 ORS
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13-10-2026
1. The present interlocutory application is filed for continuance of the interim protection granted earlier to the petitioner by a Co-ordinate Bench under its order dated 18.09.2026 in the writ petition.
2. By the aforesaid order, the following interim protection was granted: “Considering the projections made by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, and also appreciating the directions passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the WP(C) No. 4925/2026, this Court provides that, till the next date of listing, while it would be permissible for the learned Tribunal to proceed with the hearing of the matter of CP(IB)/11/GB/2026, no final order(s) be passed, thereon. Further directions, as would be mandated in the matter, would be so passed on appearance of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, in the present proceedings.”
3. When the matter was listed on 07.10.2026, upon completion of service, this Court directed that the matter be listed on 20.11.2026 in the ‘Admission’ column. However, no effective order was passed for continuance of the interim order dated 18.09.2026, as quoted hereinabove.
4. Accordingly, the present Interlocutory Application is filed.
5. Taking note of the fact that no affidavit has been filed, the interim order shall continue subject to the fact that no order has in the meantime been passed by the learned Tribunal.
6. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
7. List WP(C) No.5086/2026 on 20.11.2026.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant