Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5624/2026 of M/S JEHIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 12 October 2026
GAHC010228142026 2026:GAU-AS:15534 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5650/2026 SRI MURLIDHAR PAREEK S/O- SRI RAMNIWAS PAREEK, RESIDENT OF -TEMPLE ROAD, SIVASAGAR, P.O. AND P.S.- SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT -SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN
GAHC010228142026
2026:GAU-AS:15534
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5650/2026
SRI MURLIDHAR PAREEK
S/O- SRI RAMNIWAS PAREEK,
RESIDENT OF -TEMPLE ROAD, SIVASAGAR, P.O. AND P.S.- SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT -SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN -785640
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ROOM NO.- 66, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI -110001
2:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
5TH FLOOR
GST BHAWAN
KEDAR ROAD
MACHKHOWA
GUWAHATI- 781001.
3:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FINANCE (TAXATION) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 06
KAMRUP (M )ASSAM
4:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
ASSAM
KAR BHAWAN
G.S. ROAD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 06
KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
SIVASAGAR-1
SIVASAGAR ZONE
COURT CAMPUS
SIVASAGAR
P. O AND DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM- 785640
For the Petitioner (s) : Ms. N. Gogoi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, SC, Finance & Taxation Mr. S. Chetia, Advocate
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
13.10.2026
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that there is a formal defect in the instant writ petition, and therefore, submits that the Petitioner would like to withdraw with the liberty to re-file
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Liberty, however, is granted to the Petitioner to re-file after removing the formal defect.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant