Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3570/2026 of ANISUR RAHMAN @ ANISUR RAHAMAN Vs THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND ORS. on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010167142026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3570/2026 ANISUR RAHMAN @ ANISUR RAHAMAN S/O. LT. SAHIDUR RAHMAN, R/O. UTTAR MARAGADADHAR, P.O. MANGALDAI, P.S. AGOMANI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, 783335 VERSUS THE

GAHC010167142026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3570/2026

ANISUR RAHMAN @ ANISUR RAHAMAN

S/O. LT. SAHIDUR RAHMAN, R/O. UTTAR MARAGADADHAR, P.O.

MANGALDAI, P.S. AGOMANI, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, 783335

VERSUS

THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND

ORS.

THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI

2:THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

KOKRAJHAR

GOSSAINGAON

BTC

ASSAM

4:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

BTC

ASSAM

THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

BTC

ASSAM

5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

BTC

KOKRAJHAR

GOSSAINGAO

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M J GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, ELEM. EDU,SC, BTC

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2] This interlocutory applicant has been filed by the applicant under Order XXII Rule 3 R/W Section 151 of CPC seeking substitution as the authorized legal heir of the petitioner namely late Sahidur Rahman in WP(C) No.4984/2025. The petitioner in WP(C) No.4984/2025 has four children. The applicant namely Anisur Rahman @Anisur Rahaman is the son of the said petitioner and he has three daughters. The daughters of the said petitioner have executed No Objection Certificate on 03.07.2026. Under such circumstances, this interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant seeking substitution and inclusion as sole legal heir of the said petitioner. 3] The learned counsel for the respondents do not raise any objection. 4] Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed in the face of NOC stated to have been executed by the other legal heirs of the petitioner namely Sahidur Rahman, who are his daughters and the applicant namely Anisur Rahman @Anisur Rahaman is substituted as sole legal heir in place of the writ petitioner namely Sahidur Rahman who had expired during the pendency of the writ petition. 5] This application stands disposed of. 6] The petitioner will file amended cause title before the Registry within a period of one week from today. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead