Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3468/2026 of SRI RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010212612026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3468/2026 SRI RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA SO. LATE RABINDRA KUAR DUTTA, RO. RANGIRKHARI TARANI ROAD, SILCHAR 78005, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010212612026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3468/2026

SRI RAJIB KUMAR DUTTA

SO. LATE RABINDRA KUAR DUTTA, RO. RANGIRKHARI TARANI ROAD, SILCHAR 78005, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, KAHILIPARA, GHY, ASSAM

2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

NOW DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

CACHAR

PO SILCHAR

DIST CACHAR

ASSAM

3:SMT HIMASREE DEKA

ACS

EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE

CACHAR

PO SILCHAR

DIST CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN 78800

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, SEC. EDU.

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

13.10.2026 Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant for withdrawal of the writ petition being WP(C) No.1375/2023 filed by the applicant as petitioner therein. Mr. P.K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel for the opposite party does not object to the prayer made, however, no liberty should be granted to the petitioner to re-file the same. No objection is also raised by Ms. P. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education. Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant on the other hand submits that he simply wants to withdraw the writ petition and seeks no liberty. In view of the submissions made, this interlocutory application being No.3468/2026 is allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead