Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/980/2026 of NEERAJ DEKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 12 October 2026
GAHC010183862026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/980/2026 NEERAJ DEKA S/O LATE KRIPA NATH DEKA R/O CLASSIC RESIDENCY 1C 1ST FLOOR GNRC ROAD P.S. AND P.O. DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. VERSUS THE
GAHC010183862026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/980/2026
NEERAJ DEKA
S/O LATE KRIPA NATH DEKA
R/O CLASSIC RESIDENCY
1C
1ST FLOOR
GNRC ROAD
P.S. AND P.O. DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PP
ASSAM.
2:ANGANA SHARMA
D/O KIRAN CH. SHARMA
R/O FLAT 1
A
PRAKRITI GREENS APARTMENTS
SURVEY
BELTOLA
P.O. BELTOLA
P.S. DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781128
DIST. KAMRUP M
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MS M SAHOO
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.10.2026
1. Heard Ms. M. Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.
2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for rectification of the errors in the original criminal revision application being Criminal Revision Petition No. 442 of 2026.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the cause title of the said revision application it has been inadvertently mentioned that the application was filed under Section 438 read with Section 440 of the BNSS, 2023. However, the same ought to have been mentioned as an application under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, learned counsel prays for correction of the said error. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the body of the petition the dates of the incident have been incorrectly mentioned as 17.05.2024 and 18.05.2024/ 18.05.2026. The correct date of the incident is 17.05.2025 and the FIR was lodged on 18.05.2025. Accordingly, learned counsel prays that the said errors be corrected. She further submits that in paragraph 10 of the petition, the date of the FIR has been erroneously mentioned as 25.05.2026 whereas the correct date is 25.04.2026. The learned counsel submits that the same is a clerical error requiring correction.
4. Upon consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it fit to allow the instant application. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file an amended criminal revision petition incorporating the aforesaid corrections.
5. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant