Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4874/2025 of SANKAR DAS AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 11 October 2026
GAHC010181162025 2026:GAU-AS:15319 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4874/2025 SANKAR DAS AND ANR S/O- ANIL DAS, VILL.- MAHAKAL, WARD NO. 3, P.S. BADARPUR, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM 2: SAHID AHMED S/O- TAJAMUL ALI VILL.- MOHAKOL
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010181162025
2026:GAU-AS:15319
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4874/2025
SANKAR DAS AND ANR
S/O- ANIL DAS, VILL.- MAHAKAL, WARD NO. 3, P.S. BADARPUR, DIST.
SRIBHUMI, ASSAM
2: SAHID AHMED
S/O- TAJAMUL ALI
VILL.- MOHAKOL
P.S. BADARPUR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER
SRIBHUMI
P.O. KARIMGANJ
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
PIN- 788710.
4:THE PRESIDENT
MAKAHAL GAON PANCHAYAT
VILL.- AND P.O. MAHAKAL
Page No.# 2/2
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSAM
5:SMTI SUKRITI SUKLABAIDYA
W/O- SUBODH SUKLABAIDHYA
VILL. AND P.O. MAKAKAL
P.S. BADARPUR
DIST. SRIBHUMI
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, MS G TALUKDAR,Z HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. F A HASSAN(R5),MS. U NANDA(R5),MR.
RAJARSHEE DE(R5),SC, ASEC,SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12.10.2026
Heard Mr. H.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. After arguing at some length, learned counsel submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with the liberty to approach the appropriate forum, as permissible under law. Prayer stands allowed. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant