Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/1046/2026 of SRI SANJU SORONGI @ SONJOOK SORONGI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 11 October 2026
GAHC010206492026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1046/2026 in Crl.A./363/2026 SRI SANJU SORONGI @ SONJOOK SORONGI SON OF SRI PURANDHAR SORONGI RESIDENT OF LETEKUJAN T.E. NEW LINE, P.S.- GOLAGHAT DISTRICT-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010206492026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1046/2026 in Crl.A./363/2026
SRI SANJU SORONGI @ SONJOOK SORONGI
SON OF SRI PURANDHAR SORONGI
RESIDENT OF LETEKUJAN T.E.
NEW LINE, P.S.- GOLAGHAT
DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM
2:SRI AMIT BAWARI
SON OF LATE RAJU BAWARI
RESIDENT OF LETEKUJAN T.E.
NEW LINE, P.S.- GOLAGHAT
DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT
ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MR. K BORUAH
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12.10.2026 Heard Mr. K. Boruah, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Ms.
Page No.# 2/2 S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No.1. This application under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 is preferred by the applicant for suspension of the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Golaghat, in Special POCSO Case No.04/2022, vide judgment and order dated 20.08.2026. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the connected appeal is already admitted and the record has been called for and the applicant is presently on previous bail and till disposal of the connected appeal, he may be allowed to remain on previous bail. Ms. Bora, learned Additional P.P. submits that she has no objection, if the applicant is allowed to remain on previous bail. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, specially the period which has been sentenced to suffer, this Court is inclined to allow this application. The applicant is allowed to remain on previous bail till disposal of the connected appeal. I.A. stands disposed of. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE