Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/829/2025 of UTTARAN SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY, AN NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION Vs THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION on 11 October 2026
GAHC010032202025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/829/2025 UTTARAN SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY, AN NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HENGRABARI, FOREST GATE, NEAR DC OFFICE, GUWAHATI, 781036,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010032202025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/829/2025
UTTARAN SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY, AN NON GOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATION
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HENGRABARI, FOREST GATE, NEAR
DC OFFICE, GUWAHATI, 781036, KAMRUP(M) REPRESENTED BY SRI
MUNIDRA NARAYAN MEDHI, SON OF LATE PRAFULLA CHANDRA
KALITA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
VERSUS
THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
GANESH MANDIR, GUWAHATI, PIN 781006 AND IS REPRESENTED BY THE
COMMISSIONER
2:THE COMMISSIONER
THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
GANESH MANDIR
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
3:SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND BEAUTY CULTURE
AN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DHIRENPARA P/O AND P/S - FATASHIL AMBARI
PIN 781025 DISTRICT - KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
SRI SADHAN DA
For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. D. Deka, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Nayak, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
12.10.2026
Mr. D. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the tender was for only one year.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant