Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3206/2022 of GOPIRAM BORUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. on 11 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010089572022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3206/2022 GOPIRAM BORUAH S/O. SADHAN CH. BORUAH, VILL. BORAHOM GAON, P.O. BORAHOM KATHANI, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM.

GAHC010089572022

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3206/2022

GOPIRAM BORUAH

S/O. SADHAN CH. BORUAH, VILL. BORAHOM GAON, P.O. BORAHOM

KATHANI, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. DEPTT. OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY.-06.

2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

KAHILIPARA

GHY.-19

KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM.

3:THE DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

JORHAT DISTRICT REP. BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

JORHAT DISTRICT.

4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

JORHAT DISTRICT.

5:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

NORTH WEST JORHAT BLOCK

JORHAT.

6:THE HEAD MASTER

TINGTINGIA ANUSUSIT JATI M.E. SCHOOL

VILL. TINGTINGIA

P.O. BORHAM KATHANI

PIN-785006

DIST. JORHAT

ASSAM.

7:BUDHIN BARUAH

TUTOR TINGTINGIA ANUSUSIT JATI M.E. SCHOOL

VILL. TINGTINGIA

P.O. BORHAM KATHANI

PIN-785006

DIST. JORHAT

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS, MR S SARMAH

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

12.10.2026 No steps have been taken inspite of the fresh opportunities being granted. 2] This writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. 3] Ms. N.M. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education appears for the respondent No.1, Ms. K. Phukan, learned Government Advocate appears for the State respondents. 4] Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

5] Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, is also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead