Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3971/2026 of ABDUL KARIM MAZUMDER Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 11 October 2026
GAHC010156812026 2026:GAU-AS:15399 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3971/2026 ABDUL KARIM MAZUMDER S/O.SIRAJ ALI MAZUMDER R/O.SINGERBOND PART-III, P.O.HAZARIGRAM BAZAR DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
GAHC010156812026
2026:GAU-AS:15399
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3971/2026
ABDUL KARIM MAZUMDER
S/O.SIRAJ ALI MAZUMDER R/O.SINGERBOND PART-III, P.O.HAZARIGRAM
BAZAR DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVT.OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT (INLAND WATER
TRANSPORT), DISPUR,GUWAHATI.
2:THE DIRECTOR
INLAND WATER TRANSPORT
ULUBARI
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-7.
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DIVISION
SILCHAR
4:MOIMUL HAQUE MAZUMDER
S/O.LALU MIA MAZUMDER R/O.SONABARIGHAT BAZAR NEAR BAZAR
MASJID
P.O. SONABARIGHAT
DIST. CACHAR ASSA
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. Laskar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. D. Borah, Standing Counsel Mr. K. Kalita, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.10.2026
Heard Mr. J. Laskar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. M.D. Borah, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the IWT Department and Mr. K. Kalita, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the private respondent.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the temporary settlement made in favour of the private respondent.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the meantime, the final settlement has been granted in favour of the respondent No. 4 against which a separate writ petition being WP(C) No. 5592/2026 has been filed. The learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the instant writ petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel, however, submitted that the records of the instant writ petition be tagged with the records of WP(C) No. 5592/2026, as the same would aid in the adjudication of the said writ petition.
4. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
5. The Registry shall, however, tag the records of the present writ petition with those of WP(C) No. 5592/2026.
6. Interim order, if any, stand vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant