Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2790/2026 of ARIFUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 11 October 2026
GAHC010203972026 2026:GAU-AS:15427 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2790/2026 ARIFUL ISLAM S/O MAINUL HOQUE, R/O VILL - HATIMURIA, WARD NO. 04, P.S.- MOIRABARI, DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010203972026
2026:GAU-AS:15427
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2790/2026
ARIFUL ISLAM
S/O MAINUL HOQUE, R/O VILL - HATIMURIA, WARD NO. 04, P.S.- MOIRABARI, DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : S K PODDAR, MR. R GHOSH,R MANDAL,MR. C SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
12.10.2026
Heard Mr. S.K. Poddar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned PP for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the grant of bail to the petitioners, namely, Ajaharul Islam and Azaharul Islam, in connection with Moibari P.S. Case No. 82/2026 under Section 61(2)/319(2)/318(4)/336(3)/340(2)/95/3(5) of the BNS, 2023, read with Section 66(C)/66(D) of the Information and Technology Act.
3. The petitioners were arrested on 01.08.2026 and 24.08.2026 and since then they have been under custody.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations relating to cyber crimes have been made in the FIR dated 30.07.2026, however, the petitioners herein are not among of the ten named accused persons and they were arrested during investigation soon after the FIR. It is also contended that the petitioners are not involved in the alleged offences and that they have also been implicated due to some political rivalries.
5. Upon perusal of the CD, it appears that incriminating material is available 2 therein. However, the petitioner has spent 49 days in custody.
6. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Morigaon, Assam.
7. It is provided herein that the petitioners shall appear before the learned trial Court on each date fixed in the case and shall not tamper with the evidence or influence any witness.
8. The bail petition stands disposed of as allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant