Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5091/2025 of RATUL CHANDRA ROY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 11 October 2026
GAHC010193542025 2026:GAU-AS:15397 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5091/2025 RATUL CHANDRA ROY S/O DASHARATH ROY, R/O MOIRABARI, P.O. AND P.S.- MOIRABARI, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
GAHC010193542025
2026:GAU-AS:15397
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5091/2025
RATUL CHANDRA ROY
S/O DASHARATH ROY, R/O MOIRABARI, P.O. AND P.S.- MOIRABARI, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782126
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, ASSAM, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSAM
JURIPAR
PANJABARI
GUWAHATI-37
ASSAM
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782105
4:THE MORIGAON ZILLA PARISHAD
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
P.O. AND P.S.- MORIGAON
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782105
5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MORIGAON ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. AND P.S.- MORIGAON
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782105
6:THE MARKET SETTLEMENT COMMITTEE
MORIGAON ZILA PARISHAD
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782126
7:MOSTAFA SHAHIDUL ISLAM
S/O HAMED ALI
R/O MOIRABARI
P.O. AND P.S.- MOIRABARI
DIST- MORIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78212
For the Petitioner (s) : Ms. P. Sarmah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : XXXX
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
12.10.2026
Ms. P. Sarmah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous taking into account that the period of settlement is over.
2. Considering the above, the writ petition therefore stands closed as it has become infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant