Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3266/2026 of SARFARAZ AHMED AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 11 October 2026

GAHC010227422026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3266/2026 1. SARFARAZ AHMED AND ANR S/O- ALAJUDDIN AHMED, R/O- BARIKA CHUBURI, P.S.- SADAR THANA, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM. 2: JABED ANSARI S/O- MEHBUB ANSARI

GAHC010227422026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3266/2026

1. SARFARAZ AHMED AND ANR

S/O- ALAJUDDIN AHMED, R/O- BARIKA CHUBURI, P.S.- SADAR THANA, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM.

2: JABED ANSARI

S/O- MEHBUB ANSARI

R/O-2 NO. MEDHISUBURI TOWN

P.S.- DHEKIAJULI

DIST- SONITPUR

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. J JAKARIA,MR. MD IMDAD,MD

IMRAN,MS F HUSSAIN

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

Page 1 of 2

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

O R D E R

12.10.2026

Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for release on bail of the accused/petitioners who were arrested on 16.09.2026 in connection with Jogighopa Police Station Case No. 155/2026 under Section 303(2)/317(2)/281/125(a)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 r/w Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and r/w Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960.

3. As per the allegation, one four wheeler vehicle met with an accident on 16.09.2026 at Chaltanapara, Abhayapuri and the driver fled from the scene. Upon searched of the vehicle, the present petitioners were found inside the vehicle alongwith three numbers of goats. On suspicion that the goats were stolen, an FIR has been lodged.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that considering the period of detention of 29 days, further detention may not be necessary.

5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case pleaded by the petitioners, the prayer for bail is allowed.

6. Accordingly, accused namely, i) Sarfaraz Ahmed and ii) Jabed Ansari are allowed to go on bail with a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty thousand) with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned jurisdictional Magistrate with proper verification of the case.

7. The bail application stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead