Gauhati High Court
AB/2571/2026 of NARAYAN SAHA ALIAS NARAYAN CH SAHA AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 8 October 2026
GAHC010225342026 2026:GAU-AS:15233 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2571/2026 NARAYAN SAHA ALIAS NARAYAN CH SAHA AND ANR S/O-KAMAKHYA LAL SAHA, VILLAGE- BHAWRAGURI BARUAPARA NO.2, P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM. 2:
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010225342026
2026:GAU-AS:15233
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2571/2026
NARAYAN SAHA ALIAS NARAYAN CH SAHA AND ANR
S/O-KAMAKHYA LAL SAHA, VILLAGE- BHAWRAGURI BARUAPARA NO.2, P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM.
2: PANKAJ SAHA ALIAS BANDHU SUNDAR SAHA
S/O-SANKAR SAHA VILLAGE-NIZ BAHARI
BANDHU P.S. TARABARI
DIST. BARPETA
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A HUSSAIN, MR. K ALOM,MR. T ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.10. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking pre- Page No.# 2/2 arrest bail to the petitioners, namely, 1. Narayan Saha @ Narayan Ch. Saha and 2. Pankaj Saha @ Bandhu Sundar Saha, in connection with Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 225/2026 under Section 61/ 329/ 296/351/117 (2) of BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with the aforesaid case and, therefore, to participate in an investigation they may allowed the privilege of a pre-arrest bail.
4. The learned Addl. P.P has drawn attention of this Court to the provisions of Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 by which a pre-arrest bail may be considered by this Court when a person apprehends arrest in a non-bailable offence.
5. The offences alleged in the FIR are admittedly bailable offences.
6. The provisions of Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, therefore, need not be invoked in the present case.
7. Accordingly the anticipated bail petition is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant