Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5598/2026 of M/S BRAJANATH GOGOI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 8 October 2026
GAHC010217882026 2026:GAU-AS:15304 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5598/2026 M/S BRAJANATH GOGOI AND ANR CHUKAFA NAGAR, TINGRAI HABI, SRIPURIA, TINSUKIA 786145, ASSAM, A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI
GAHC010217882026
2026:GAU-AS:15304
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5598/2026
M/S BRAJANATH GOGOI AND ANR
CHUKAFA NAGAR, TINGRAI HABI, SRIPURIA, TINSUKIA 786145, ASSAM, A
PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI
BRAJANATH GOGOI.
2: SHRI BRAJANATH GOGOI
PROPRIETOR OF M/S BRAJANATH GOGOI
SUKAPHA NAGAR
SRIPURIA
TINSUKIA781021
ASSAM. MOBILE NO.-98640-1188
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND TAXATION,DISPUR,ASSAM, GUWAHATI - 781006.
2:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
ASSAM KAR BHAWAN
GANESHGURI
GUWAHATI781006.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
ASSAM
TINSUKIA
ASSAM
4:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
ASSAM
TINSUKIA
CIRCLE-
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. N. Jha, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Choudhury, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.10.2026
Heard Mr. N. N. Jha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. B. Choudhury, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State GST.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that taking into account that in the meantime order has been passed pursuant to the notice issued under Section 74 and 74A of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and further that the various orders and proceedings which are assailed in the present proceedings may have a connection but being separate and distinct, the Petitioners would like to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petitions challenging the respective impugned actions.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to file separate writ petitions challenging the separate actions.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant