Gauhati High Court
AB/2569/2026 of SRI PROLASH MILLIK Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 8 October 2026
GAHC010226302026 2026:GAU-AS:15230 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2569/2026 SRI PROLASH MILLIK SON OF LATE HARMON MILLIK RESIDENT OF BORDONKA PS BAITHALANGSO PO DONKAMUKAM DISTRICT WEST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010226302026
2026:GAU-AS:15230
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2569/2026
SRI PROLASH MILLIK
SON OF LATE HARMON MILLIK RESIDENT OF BORDONKA PS
BAITHALANGSO PO DONKAMUKAM DISTRICT WEST KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BORA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.10. 2026 Heard Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused person/applicant, namely, Sri Prolash
Millik, in connection with PRC Case No. 78/2025 under Section 409/ 420/ 34 of the Indian Penal code pending against the petitioner in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, West Karbi Anglong at Hamren.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had participated in the investigation process in connection with the aforesaid case and he was not placed under arrest during the investigation period.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a Government servant, who is presently serving as an Assistant Block Development Officer in the Office of the Chinthong ITDP Block, Hamren, West Karbi Anlong.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the he has received summons to appear and participate for the trial. He submits that however, the petitioner is apprehensive and in the event of his arrest during the trial period, the petitioner who is a Government servant to face much difficulty.
6. The learned Addl. P.P has submitted that when he was not arrested during the period of investigation, the probability of him taking into custody for the trial period is not there and the petitioner may approach the learned Trial Court to pray for appropriate bail.
8. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is a Government servant, had participated in the investigation process and is eager to participate in the trial proceedings also, prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner is accepted. Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on 03.11.2026 to participate and cooperate in the trial proceedings. He shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.30, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.
9. The learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to impose such other conditions as may be necessary to ensure the participation of the petitioner in the trial proceedings. Any willful absence to avoid the trial proceedings shall be dealt with appropriately by the learned Trial Court.
10. AB is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant