Gauhati High Court
AB/2546/2026 of ALABAHASH ALI @ ALABOKSH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 7 October 2026
GAHC010222722026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2546/2026 ALABAHASH ALI @ ALABOKSH SON OF LATE SURAT ALI, VILLAGE- TANGAON PART- III, P.S.- MANKACHAR, DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783135 VERSUS THE
GAHC010222722026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2546/2026
ALABAHASH ALI @ ALABOKSH
SON OF LATE SURAT ALI, VILLAGE- TANGAON PART- III, P.S.- MANKACHAR, DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 783135
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A Z AHMED, A.K.SK,MR. A KHALEK
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.10.2026 Heard Mr. A. Z. Ahmed, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. J. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Mankachar P.S. Case No. 1919/2026, registered under Sections
126(2), 78(2), 331(2), as well as 75(2) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner is apprehending arrest was lodged by the victim herself, stating inter alia that, from long the petitioner had attempted to established illicit relationship with her and that, on 04.09.2026, at about 08:00 PM, when her husband was not at home, the petitioner entered her house and caught her and embraced her and tried to rape her. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the information given in the FIR is a concocted allegation.
4. Mr. R. J. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam, on the other hand submits that, the allegations against the petitioner are writ large in the FIR.
5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel and more so, in view of the fact that, the story narrated in the FIR is not the complete story as could be deduced, this Court enlarges the petitioner on pre- arrest bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20, 000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority under the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall appear before the IO within 15 days from the date of the order and thereafter as and when call for.
(ii) The petitioners shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the alleged case; and
(iii) The petitioners shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Arresting Authority.
6. The AB Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant