Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2491/2026 of SRI KARAN BORO Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 7 October 2026
GAHC010182052026 2026:GAU-AS:15145 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2491/2026 SRI KARAN BORO S/O LATE BINOD BORO, R/O VILL MILANPUR, PO TOPATOLI, PS KHETRI, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN 782403 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010182052026
2026:GAU-AS:15145
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2491/2026
SRI KARAN BORO
S/O LATE BINOD BORO, R/O VILL MILANPUR, PO TOPATOLI, PS KHETRI, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN 782403
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR, SR. ADV., MR. D GOGOI,DEVABRATA
SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : SPECIAL PP ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08-10-2026 Heard Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the Wildlife and Forest Department.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for Page No.# 2/2 grant of bail to the accused applicant in connection with Forest Offence No. SP/42 of 2026-27 dated 06.08.2026 under Sections 9/39 read with Sections 2 (1/2/14/16/20/31/31/35/36/37) of Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972.
3. Mr. B. Sharma, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the Wildlife and Forest Department has submitted that Final Offence Report in the instant case has been filed vide No. B/KE/Wild/5020-21 dated 30.09.2026 before the jurisdictional Court.
4. In view of the aforesaid, Ms. Borah, learned counsel for the accused applicant, submits that since the accused applicant has already been granted interim bail, the interim bail granted to the accused applicant earlier may be made absolute, as the accused applicant is willing to appear before the jurisdictional Court to face the trial.
5. Taking into account the aforesaid submissions, this bail application is disposed of by making the interim bail granted to the accused applicant, dated 28.08.2026 absolute, with the condition that the accused applicant shall appear before the jurisdictional Court as and when required. JUDGE Comparing Assistant