Gauhati High Court
AB/806/2026 of MD WAHIDUR RAHMAN AND 5 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 7 October 2026
GAHC010076292026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/806/2026 MD WAHIDUR RAHMAN AND 5 ORS. S/O- AFAJUDDIN AHMED 2: MD ABADUR RAHMAN S/O- AFAJUDDIN AHMED 3: AMINA BEGUM W/O- ABADUR RAHMAN ALL ARE RESIDENT OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010076292026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/806/2026
MD WAHIDUR RAHMAN AND 5 ORS.
S/O- AFAJUDDIN AHMED
2: MD ABADUR RAHMAN
S/O- AFAJUDDIN AHMED
3: AMINA BEGUM
W/O- ABADUR RAHMAN
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-GARIGAON MEDHIPARA
POGUWAHATI UNIVERSITY
PSJALUKBARI
DIST- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
4: MD RAJ HUSSAIN NAJRUL
S/O- ABDUL HUSSAIN.
5: NAJIA HUSSAIN RINA
W/O- MD. RAJ HUSSAIN NAJRUL
6: MD ASHIQUE NAJ HUSSAIN
S/O- MD. RAJ HUSSAIN NAJRUL.
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF NEAR SDC OFFICE
SONAPUR
PO- SONAPUR
PS- SONAPUR
DISTKAMRUP(M)
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AZAD, MR. I HUSSAIN,MR N JAMAL,MR A K KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.10.2026
Heard Mr. N. Jamal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. DP Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. DP Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the charge sheet has been laid in the instant case vide charge sheet no. 150/2026 dated 29.05.2026. As such, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he be allowed to move the appropriate application before the concerned Court. Prayer is allowed. Further, the interim order be continued for another 15 days so as to enable the petitioner to avail his relief. Petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant