Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/896/2026 of SRI PRANAB JYOTI BORAH Vs SRI BHARGOV BORAH on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010057112026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/896/2026 SRI PRANAB JYOTI BORAH S/O. LT. BHUDHAR BORAH, R/O. VILL.- JARABARI, P/O. AND P/S. BEHALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM, PIN-784166 VERSUS SRI BHARGOV BORAH

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010057112026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/896/2026

SRI PRANAB JYOTI BORAH

S/O. LT. BHUDHAR BORAH, R/O. VILL.- JARABARI, P/O. AND P/S. BEHALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM, PIN-784166

VERSUS

SRI BHARGOV BORAH

S/O. SRI PRANABJYOTI BORA, R/O. SANTIPUR, WARD NO. 6, BISWANATH

CHARIALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM, PIN-784176

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINGH, MR. A GANGULY,MR. A DHANUKA

Advocate for the Respondent : MR D K NATH,

Linked Case : MFA/32/2025

BHARGOV BORAH

S/O. SRI PRANABJYOTI BORA

R/O. SANTIPUR

WARD NO. 6

BISWANATH CHARIALI

DIST. BISWANATH

ASSAM

PIN-784176

VERSUS

Page No.# 2/2

PRANABJYOTI BORAH

S/O. LT. BHUDHAR BORAH

R/O. VILL.- JARABARI

P/O. AND P/S. BEHALI

DIST. BISWANATH

ASSAM

PIN-784166

------------

Advocate for : MR D K NATH

Advocate for : MR. S K SINGH appearing for PRANABJYOTI BORAH

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.10.2026

1. Heard Mr. D. K. Nath, the learned counsel for the opposite party. Also heard Mr. A. Dhanuka, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant/respondent Sri Pranab Jyoti Borah, praying for an early hearing of connected MFA No. 332/2023.

3. The prayer is not opposed to by the other side and same is allowed.

4. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of with a direction to list the connected MFA in the hearing column on 19.11.2026.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead