Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/658/2024 of SALEHA BEGUM LASKAR Vs NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS AND 2 ORS. on 6 October 2026
GAHC010252932024 2026:GAU-AS:15083 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/658/2024 SALEHA BEGUM LASKAR W/O MD SAIFUDDIN LASKAR, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. GANIGRAM, P.S. KATIGORAH, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010252932024
2026:GAU-AS:15083
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/658/2024
SALEHA BEGUM LASKAR
W/O MD SAIFUDDIN LASKAR, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. GANIGRAM, P.S.
KATIGORAH, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS AND 2 ORS.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, CUM I/C
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM
2:SMTI MAMATA HOJAI
AES
THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GUWAHATI-19 CUM CHAIRMAN
STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
3:GANESH HARIJAN
INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
CACHAR
DISTRICT CIRCLE
CACHAR
SILCHAR
CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY
DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION
CACHAR
SILCHA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F U BARBHUIYA, MS S DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1), MR. U SARMA (R-2),MS N M SARMA(R-
1),MR S M T CHISTIE(R-1,3)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07-10-2026 Heard Mr. F. U. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. U. Sharma, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor, by placing the copy of the order dated 06.10.2026, passed by the Director, Secondary Education Department, Assam, submits that the order dated 16.06.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 2428/2016, has duly been complied with, as the case of the petitioner has been considered by the competent authority and the same was rejected on the ground that the petitioner does not possess the requisite qualification of Diploma in Assamese Typewriting.
Perusal of the order dated 06.10.2026 reflects that the order of this Court dated 16.06.2023 has been duly complied with.
Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed.
However, it is observed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps, in accordance with law, for challenging the order dated 06.10.2026, if so aggrieved.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant