Gauhati High Court
AB/2299/2026 of ABDUL AZIZ ALI @ AZID ALI AND ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 6 October 2026
GAHC010207522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2299/2026 ABDUL AZIZ ALI @ AZID ALI AND ORS. SON OF LATEEMARAT ALI RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- AMBARI BHUYANPARA P.S. FAKIRGANJ DISTRICT-DHUBRI ASSAM. 2: APUSI KHATUN @ APUCHI
GAHC010207522026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2299/2026
ABDUL AZIZ ALI @ AZID ALI AND ORS.
SON OF LATEEMARAT ALI
RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- AMBARI BHUYANPARA
P.S. FAKIRGANJ
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM.
2: APUSI KHATUN @ APUCHI KHATUN
WIFE OF ABDUL AZIZ ALI
RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- AMBARI BHUYANPARA
P.S. FAKIRGANJ
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM.
3: AZIMON NESSA @ AJIRON NESSA
DAUGHTER OF ABDUL AZIZ ALI
RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- AMBARI BHUYANPARA
P.S. FAKIRGANJ
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : MS M MALIK
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Linked Case :AB/2342/2026
AKTAR HUSSAIN ALIAS AFTAR HUSSAIN AND 3 ORS.
SON OFABDUL AZIZ ALIAS AZID ALI, RESIDENTOF VILLAGE- AMBARI
BHUYANPARA,P.S. FAKIRGANJ, DISTRICT- DHUBRI,ASSAM.
2: HOSEN ALI ALIAS HUSSAIN ALI
SON OF ABDUL AZIZ ALIAS AZID ALI
RESIDENT OFVILLAGE- AMBARI BHUYANPARA
P.S. FAKIRGANJ
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM.
3: AKIRUL ISLAM ALIAS AKHIRUL ISLAM
SON OF SHAHID ALI ALIAS SHOHID ALI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAJER ALGAPT-IV
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T SK, MS M MALIK,MR R KARIM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07-10-2026 Heard Mr. T. SK, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.K. Das, learned Addl. PP. By the Order dated 18.09.2026, this Court had granted an interim protection allowing the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer to cause furtherance of the investigation. It has been submitted at the bar that the petitioners have accordingly appeared before the Investigating Officer and their statements have also been recorded. In view of the above, I do not find any reason for the petitioner's custodial interrogation. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioners by the Order dated 18.09.2026 is made absolute during the period of investigation. AB is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant