Gauhati High Court
AB/2026/2026 of PUTUL BARMAN AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 6 October 2026
GAHC010179952026 2026:GAU-AS:15127 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2026/2026 PUTUL BARMAN AND ANR S/O LATE KANCHA BARMAN, R/O DAKSHIN LENGA, P.O. BAIHATA CHARIALI, P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781381. 2:
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010179952026
2026:GAU-AS:15127
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2026/2026
PUTUL BARMAN AND ANR
S/O LATE KANCHA BARMAN, R/O DAKSHIN LENGA, P.O. BAIHATA
CHARIALI, P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-
781381.
2: MUN BARMAN
S/O NAREN BARMAN
R/O DAKSHIN LENGA
P.O. BAIHATA CHARIALI
P.S. BAIHATA CHARIALI
DISTRICT KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN-781381
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AHMED, MR. R AHMED,MS P KAKATI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07-10-2026
Heard Mr. AK Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr.
Page No.# 2/2 KK Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused persons, namely, 1. Putul Barman and 2. Mun Barman, in connection with Baihata Chariali P.S. Case No. 168/2026 under Sections 132/117(2)/61(1)/62/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Authority and their statements have been recorded. The petitioners were on interim pre-arrest bail during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application.
5. Since the charge-sheet has been submitted, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition, and it is accordingly closed, making the anticipatory bail application absolute till receipt of summons from the learned Trial Court, if the petitioners are charge-sheeted.
6. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant