Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3438/2026 of SMT TULIKA BORAH AND ANR. Vs THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS. on 6 October 2026
GAHC010209302026 2026:GAU-AS:15018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3438/2026 SMT TULIKA BORAH AND ANR. WIFE OF LATE MODAN BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMGURI MIRIGAON PO. DEOTULA PS. NARAYANPUR DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
GAHC010209302026
2026:GAU-AS:15018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3438/2026
SMT TULIKA BORAH AND ANR.
WIFE OF LATE MODAN BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMGURI MIRIGAON
PO. DEOTULA
PS. NARAYANPUR
DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM PIN 784164.
2: SHRI NIHAR JYOTI BORAH
SON OF LATE MODAN BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMGURI MIRIGAON PO DEOTULA
PS NARAYANPUR
DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM
PIN 784164
VERSUS
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS.
REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGIONAL MANAGER, ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7
DISTRICT -KAMRUP M, ASSAM.
2:SHRI PULAK BORAH
SON OF KAMAL BORAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SARUKATHANI
PO BIHPURIA
PS BIHPURIA
DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM PIN 784169
OWNER OF VEHICLE REGISTRATION NO AS 07 AC 4307.
3:SHRI PURNA GOGOI
SON OF LUHIT GOGOI C O PUWAI SAIKIA PO MACHKHOWA PS DHEMAJI
DISTRICT DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN 787058 DRIVER OF VEHICLE
REGISTRATION NO AS 07 AC 4307
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MS. M BHUYAN,MS. P BORAH,MR. M ALAM
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S K GOSWAMI, T BORAH
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.10.2026 Learned counsel, Mr. K. Boruah is present for the applicants and learned counsel, Mr. S. Sarma is present on behalf of Mr. S.K. Goswami for the appellant/Insurance Company. This Interlocutory Application is filed by the claimants with prayer to withdraw 50% of the awarded amount deposited before the Registry of this Court. I have heard both the sides. The claimants may withdraw the amount deposited with the Registry of this Court, subject to verification by the Registry and upon execution of an indemnity bond. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant