Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/7175/2023 of HABIL UDDIN @ HABIL MAMUD @ HABEL MAMUD @ KAJI HABELUDDIN Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 6 October 2026
GAHC010253052023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7175/2023 HABIL UDDIN @ HABIL MAMUD @ HABEL MAMUD @ KAJI HABELUDDIN SON OF LATE KASHEM ALI, A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KACHUMARA NC, P.S.- KACHUMARA, DISTRICT- BARPETA,
GAHC010253052023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/7175/2023
HABIL UDDIN @ HABIL MAMUD @ HABEL MAMUD @ KAJI HABELUDDIN
SON OF LATE KASHEM ALI,
A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KACHUMARA NC,
P.S.- KACHUMARA,
DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781127
PRESENT ADDRESS-
VILLAGE- SARU ARIKATI,
UNDER BOKO POLICE STATION,
IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP, ASSAM.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI-1.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER)
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI-31.
4:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI-31.
5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
NEW DELHI-1.
6:THE STATE COORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS (NRC)
ASSAM
ACHYUT PLAZA
BHARALUPAR
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-5
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ALIM, MR. A T SIKDER,MR. B HUSSAIN,MR. M H
ANSARI
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, ECI,SC, F.T,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.10.2026 (K. R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. M. H. Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Upon instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had died. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not aware of the exact date of death and therefore the matter is abated.
3. As there are consequences attached to the opinion passed by the Foreigners Tribunal, declaring the petitioner to be a foreigner, the Court had put query to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any family members are interested to substitute themselves.
4. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that none of the family members have consented to substitute themselves.
5. The matter stands dismissed on being abated on the death of the petitioner.
6. The Registry shall return back the Tribunal’s record along with a copy of this order to be made a part of the record by the said learned Tribunal.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant