Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5328/2026 of M/S M H CONSTRUCTION Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 6 October 2026
GAHC010170912026 2026:GAU-AS:15115 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5328/2026 M/S M H CONSTRUCTION HAVING ITS OFFICE SITUATED AT WARD NO. 20, GROUND FLOOR, GAYATRI PLAZA, ABC, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI 781005, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO
GAHC010170912026
2026:GAU-AS:15115
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5328/2026
M/S M H CONSTRUCTION
HAVING ITS OFFICE SITUATED AT WARD NO. 20, GROUND FLOOR, GAYATRI PLAZA, ABC, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI 781005, DISTRICT KAMRUP
METRO ASSAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI RAKESH
AGARWAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PHE (WATER)
ASSAM
HENGRABARI GUWAHATI
DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING (PHE)
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI
DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PHE
DHUBRI DIVISION
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
5:THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DISPUR GUWAHATI
DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSA
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Bora, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07.10.2026
Mr. R. Bora, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that taking into account the disputed questions of fact are involved, the petitioner would not like to pursue the present writ petition. The learned counsel, however, submitted that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition should not affect the petitioner’s right to approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. The withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice the petitioner in any proceedings initiated before the competent Court of civil jurisdiction, subject to the same being permissible in law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant