Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/3316/2026 of SMTI MAUSUMI KHAUND DAS AND ANR Vs THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS on 6 October 2026
GAHC010186992026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3316/2026 SMTI MAUSUMI KHAUND DAS AND ANR WO LATE MATHURA DAS BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF A.T. ROAD VODAFONE BUILDING OPPOSITE HAIBARGAON HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT- NAGAON
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010186992026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3316/2026
SMTI MAUSUMI KHAUND DAS AND ANR
WO LATE MATHURA DAS
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF A.T. ROAD
VODAFONE BUILDING
OPPOSITE HAIBARGAON HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM-78002.
2: SHRI PARASH MONI DAS
SO LATE MATHURA DAS
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF A.T. ROAD
VODAFONE BUILDING
OPPOSITE HAIBARGAON HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM-78002.
VERSUS
THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS
A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE REGISTERED UNDER THE
COMPANIES ACT
1956
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND STATE HEAD
INDIAN OIL AOD
HAVING ITS STATE OFFICE AT INDIAN OIL BHAVAN
SECTOR-3
NOONMATI
GUWAHATI-20.
2:THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AOD LIMITED
EAST POINT TOWER
BAMUNIMAIAM
GUWAHATI- 781021
DISTRICT-KAMRUP M
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. S P ROY
Advocate for : MR. D K SARMAH appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION
LIMITED AND ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07-10-2026 It has been submitted by Ms. V. Rai that by the orders passed in I.A.(Civil) No. 3078/2026 the applicants in I.A.(Civil) No.3316/2026 have already been directed to be impleaded as respondents in the review application. Hence she submits that the I.A. 3316/2026 has become infructuous. Accordingly, I.A. is closed as infructuous, since the relief has already been granted in I.A. No. 3078/2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant