Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5504/2026 of JOGESH DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 6 October 2026
GAHC010221362026 2026:GAU-AS:15121 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5504/2026 JOGESH DAS RESIDENT OF FATASIL, P.O. AND P.S. BHARALUMUKH, KAMRUP M, GUWAHATI VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER
GAHC010221362026
2026:GAU-AS:15121
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5504/2026
JOGESH DAS
RESIDENT OF FATASIL, P.O. AND P.S. BHARALUMUKH, KAMRUP M, GUWAHATI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, PWD DEPARTMENT, ASSAM SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF PWD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD ROAD
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-781003.
4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
PUBLIC WORKS ROAD DEPARTMENT
NALBARI RURAL ROAD DIVISION
NALBARI
PIN-781335.
5:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
ASSAM SACHIVALAYA
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
6:THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GOVT. OF ASSAM
ASSAM SACHIVALAYA
DISPUR
GHY-6.
7:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
ASSAM SACHIVALAYA
GUWAHATI-6
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. N Barman Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. M Bhuyan, Standing Counsel Finance Department Ms. PR Mahanta Standing Counsel, Revenue Department B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.10.2026 Mr. N Barman, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there are various factual disputes in the present proceedings and as such, the petitioner would be well advised to approach before the Appropriate Forum wherein evidence can be led.
2. He, therefore, submits that the instant writ petition be closed on withdrawal without prejudice to the petitioner to approach the Appropriate Forum.
3. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Withdrawal of the writ petition shall not prejudice the writ petitioner to avail remedies before the Appropriate Forum subject to the same being permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant