Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/1002/2026 of PRAKASH SHARMA @ PRAKASH JOSHI Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 5 October 2026
GAHC010216222026 2026:GAU-AS:14909 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1002/2026 PRAKASH SHARMA @ PRAKASH JOSHI SO BHAGCHAND SHARMA, RO SHANKARDEV PATH, BYELANE 06, BAKRAPARA, BASISTHA, PO BASISTHA, PS BASISTHA, DIST KAMRUP
GAHC010216222026
2026:GAU-AS:14909
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1002/2026
PRAKASH SHARMA @ PRAKASH JOSHI
SO BHAGCHAND SHARMA, RO SHANKARDEV PATH, BYELANE 06, BAKRAPARA, BASISTHA, PO BASISTHA, PS BASISTHA, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN 781029
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY, SGI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., Linked Case : AB/2316/2026
PRAKASH SHARMA ALIAS PRAKASH JOSHI
S/O BHAGCHAND SHARMA
R/O SHANKARDEV PATH
BYELANE 06
BAKRAPARA
BASISTHA
PS NALBARI
DIST KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN 781029
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SGI
------------
Advocate for : MR. M BISWAS
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.10.2026 Heard Ms. V. Khakhlary, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned CGC, for the Union of India.
2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant for correction of the cause title of the AB No. 2316/2026, in the Order, dated 22.09.2026.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the cause title of the Order, dated 22.09.2026, in A.B. No. 2316/2026, the name of the police station of the applicant has been mentioned as ‘P.S. Nalbari’; but in-fact, the same ought to have been ‘P.S. Basistha’, and as such, she submits that the word ‘P.S. Nalbari’, in the aforementioned cause title, may be deleted.
4. Mr. Parashar, learned CGC submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing the same.
5. Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of this petition, by directing to delete the word ‘P.S. Nalbari’, from the cause title of A.B. No. 2316/2026.
6. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant