Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/966/2026 of ANITA PAUL ALIAS ANITA ROY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 October 2026
GAHC010203432026 2026:GAU-AS:14973 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/966/2026 ANITA PAUL ALIAS ANITA ROY WIFE OF - SHRI SANJIB SAHA R/O-R.K MISSION ROAD OPPOSITE AVS BIRUBARI P.OGOPINATHNAGAR GUWAHATI-16 DISTRICT- KAMRUPM
GAHC010203432026
2026:GAU-AS:14973
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/966/2026
ANITA PAUL ALIAS ANITA ROY
WIFE OF - SHRI SANJIB SAHA R/O-R.K MISSION ROAD
OPPOSITE
AVS
BIRUBARI
P.OGOPINATHNAGAR
GUWAHATI-16
DISTRICT- KAMRUPM ASSAM. ANOTHER ADDRESS- KOCHGAON
P.S- BISWANATH CHARIALI DISTRICT- BISWANATH
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY TH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR P DAS
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Linked Case :Crl.Pet./1310/2026
ANITA PAUL ALIAS ANITA ROY
WIFE OF - SHRI SANJIB SAHA R/O- R.K MISSION ROAD, OPPOSITE ,AVS, BIRUBARI, P.OGOPINATHNAGAR, GUWAHATI-16, DISTRICT- KAMRUPM ASSAM. ANOTHER
ADDRESS- KOCHGAON, P.S- BISWANATH CHARIALI,
DISTRICT-BISWANATH, ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P DAS, MS N BARUAH,MR K J PATHAK
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.10.2026 Heard Mr. P. Das, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. P. Barthakur, learned Additional Pubic Prosecutor for the Opposite party.
2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail, as NBWA has been issued against the applicant in PRC Case No. 306/2025, by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biswanath Chariali.
3. It is to be noted here that the connected Criminal Petition No. 1310/2026, has already been disposed of, vide Order, dated 06.10.2026.
4. And in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in AIR 2021 SC 1918, this application for grant of pre-arrest bail in a criminal petition, for quashing the order, is not maintainable and therefore, the same stands dismissed.
5. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant