Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2963/2026 of INDUKALPA BORUAH ALIAS LATU BORUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 October 2026
GAHC010211822026 2026:GAU-AS:14952 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2963/2026 INDUKALPA BORUAH ALIAS LATU BORUAH S/O SRI ROMAKANTA BORUAH, RESIDENT OF BENGENAKHOWA, LACHIT BORPHUKAN PATH, P.S. GOLAGHAT, DISTRICT
GAHC010211822026
2026:GAU-AS:14952
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2963/2026
INDUKALPA BORUAH ALIAS LATU BORUAH
S/O SRI ROMAKANTA BORUAH, RESIDENT OF BENGENAKHOWA, LACHIT
BORPHUKAN PATH, P.S. GOLAGHAT, DISTRICT GOLAGHAT, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MS. N LETRO,MR. A M AHMED,MS. M
BHUYAN,MS. P BORAH,MR. M ALAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.10.2026 Heard Mr H R A Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr A M Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr R J Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. By this application the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Golaghat PS Case No. 208/2026, under Sections 317(4)/112/318(4)/319(2)/308(6)/308(7)/61(2)/
351(2)/351(3)/3(5)/3(6)/3(8)/3(9) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 05.09.2026, was lodged by the Police personnel of Golaghat Police Station, stating inter alia, that the petitioner along with another as well as others, without any authority and without any professional qualification, has assembled themselves in and around the Golaghat Police Station and the DC Office, Golaghat, and were systematically preying upon the informants coming to the Police Station for their grievances and also that they put influence in verification process and help the accused persons to get rid of the cases.
4. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific allegation is made against the petitioner in the said FIR and all general allegations were mentioned therein.
5. Mr R J Baruah, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on perusal of the Case Diary, has submitted few facts, which are not relevant to the instant case. He has also placed the statement of the IO, wherein it was stated that the IO had information that the petitioner is involved in certain offences.
6. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so, in view of the fact that no specific allegation is made against the petitioner, neither any victim has been mentioned in the FIR or in the forwarding report to have been victimized by the petitioner, this Court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-, with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM, Golaghat, under the following conditions:-
i) the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer/concerned Court, as and when called for.
ii) the petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witnesses; and
iii) the petitioner shall not leave his residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer/jurisdictional Court.
7. Bail Application stands disposed of.
8. Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant