Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2230/2023 of SAFIOR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS on 5 October 2026
GAHC010085892023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2230/2023 SAFIOR RAHMAN S/O- MD. WAZUDDIN SK., R/O- VILLAGE- BAKUABHANGI, P.O. BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP. BY THE COMM.
GAHC010085892023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2230/2023
SAFIOR RAHMAN
S/O- MD. WAZUDDIN SK., R/O- VILLAGE- BAKUABHANGI, P.O.
BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT
AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
PANJABARI
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN- 781037
3:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION
ASSAM
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
GUWAHATI-6
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-6
5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GHY-29
Page 1 of 2
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
GOALPARA
P.O. GOALPARA
DIST.- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783101
7:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
GOALPARA
P.O. GOALPARA
DIST.- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783101
8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
RANGJULI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
RANGJULI
P.O. RANGJULI
DIST.- GOALPARA
ASSAM
PIN- 783134
9:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
GOLOKGANJ DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
P.O. GOLOKGANJ
DIST.- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 78333
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, K U AHMED,MS F INTAZ
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG (A AND E),MR. A HASAN,SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
06.10.2026 Heard Shri S. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Shri M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri A. K. Ghosh, learned counsel representing the P&RD; Shri A. Chakraborty, learned State
Counsel and Shri C. Baruah, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Assam. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed during the pendency of the writ petition, the writ petition is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…