Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3171/2026 of AJMOT ALI AND ANR. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 October 2026
GAHC010221142026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3171/2026 AJMOT ALI AND ANR. S/O KASHEM ALI, VILL.- BADHAKARA, P.S.- BAGINADI, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR 2: UMED ALI S/O ABDUL RAHMAN VILL.- BADHAKARA P.S.- BAGINADI DIST. -
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010221142026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3171/2026
AJMOT ALI AND ANR.
S/O KASHEM ALI, VILL.- BADHAKARA, P.S.- BAGINADI, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR
2: UMED ALI
S/O ABDUL RAHMAN
VILL.- BADHAKARA
P.S.- BAGINADI
DIST. - LAKHIMPU
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S DEVI, MS. K L R YANTHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06.10.2026
Heard Ms. S Devi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
Page No.# 2/2
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, whereby the petitioners, namely, 1. Ajmot Ali and 2. Umed Ali have prayed for releasing them on bail as they are facing trial in Special (N) Case No.38/2026 registered under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai.
3. The case aforementioned is now posted for framing charges.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.
5. Commercial quantity of narcotic drugs is involved in this case. Therefore, let the trial court examine at least 3 (three) prosecution witnesses. After that, the petitioners shall have the liberty to approach this Court again for seeking bail.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant