Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3172/2026 of MUBARAK ALI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010220502026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3172/2026 MUBARAK ALI AND ANR S/O LT MD HANIF ALI, R/O FAUZDARI PATTY, PS NAGAON, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM 2: KAMAL UDDIN S/O LT IBRAHIM ALI R/O KATIMARI GRANT NEAR CHRIST

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010220502026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3172/2026

MUBARAK ALI AND ANR

S/O LT MD HANIF ALI, R/O FAUZDARI PATTY, PS NAGAON, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM

2: KAMAL UDDIN

S/O LT IBRAHIM ALI

R/O KATIMARI GRANT

NEAR CHRIST JYOTI SCHOOL

PS NAGAON

DIST NAGAON

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, MR. SURAJIT DAS,MR A W

AMAN,SAMIM RAHMAN,MD A RAHMAN

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 06.10.2026

Heard Mr. S Nawaz, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also Page No.# 2/2 heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, whereby the petitioners, namely, 1. Mubarak Ali and 2. Kamal Uddin have prayed for releasing them on bail as they are facing trial in Special NDPS Case No.143(N)/2026 registered under Section 21(a)/22(c)/25/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Nagaon.

3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

4. The trial court is yet to examine witnesses. Therefore, let the trial court examine at least 3 (three) prosecution witnesses. After that, the petitioners shall have the liberty to approach this Court again for seeking bail.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application stands closed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead