Gauhati High Court
AB/2250/2026 of BIJAN BISWAS AND ANR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 5 October 2026
GAHC010200732026 2026:GAU-AS:14965 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2250/2026 BIJAN BISWAS AND ANR SON OF LATE PRADUNYA BISWAS RESIDENT OF 12 MILE AMBHER, TAMULIKUCHI, P.S SONAPUR DISTRICT KAMRUP(M), ASSAM 2: HARI CHANDRA DEB
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010200732026
2026:GAU-AS:14965
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2250/2026
BIJAN BISWAS AND ANR
SON OF LATE PRADUNYA BISWAS RESIDENT OF 12 MILE AMBHER, TAMULIKUCHI, P.S SONAPUR DISTRICT KAMRUP(M), ASSAM
2: HARI CHANDRA DEB BARMAN
SON OF LATE SUVRAM DEB BARMAN RESIDENT OF BORNIHAT
ANTALA BASTI POLICE STATION SONAPUR DISTRICT KAMRUP(M)
ASSA
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA
N.F. RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. AJAY SARMA, MS. R R DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY, MR. K K PARASAR(C.G.C.)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06-10-2026 Heard Mr. Y. Mannan, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicants and Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned CGC for the for the respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting Page No.# 2/2 pre-arrest bail to the accused applicants in connection with RPF/POST/NGC Case No. 17/2026 under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.
3. A coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 16.09.2026, has granted interim pre-arrest bail to the accused applicants.
4. Mr. Mannan, learned counsel for the accused applicants, submits that, in terms of the order dated 16.09.2026, the applicants have already appeared before the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station and had their statements recorded.
5. Mr. Parasar, learned CGC, submits that the accused applicants have appeared before the Officer-in-Charge of the case.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid, the instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed of by making the interim pre-arrest bail order dated 16.09.2026 absolute. JUDGE Comparing Assistant