Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2826/2026 of AJIBAR @ AZIBOR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 5 October 2026
GAHC010205562026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2826/2026 AJIBAR @ AZIBOR RAHMAN SO MOHAMMAD ALI, RO VILL PHOLIMARI, PS AND DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010205562026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2826/2026
AJIBAR @ AZIBOR RAHMAN
SO MOHAMMAD ALI, RO VILL PHOLIMARI, PS AND DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD A RAHMAN, SAMIM RAHMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS,MR
SARFRAZ NAWAZ,A W AMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06-10-2026 Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. RR Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent.
2. The present petition is filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail to the petitioner, namely, Ajibar @ Azibor Rahman, in connection with Dotma P.S. Case No. 05/2026 under Sections 64(1)/75(1) of the BNS, 2023 which has culminated with Sessions Case No.T-2/62/2026 under Sections Page No.# 2/2 319(2)/64(1)/75(1) of the BNS, 2023. The petitioner was arrested on 21.05.2026.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trial of the case has proceeded to a good extent and the deposition of the victim has also been recorded. He submits that since the evidence has proceeded to a considerable extent, the continued detention of the petitioner, in view of the evidence led, would not be necessary.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner has been accused of using a fake identity to form a relationship with the alleged victim.
5. Having gone through the materials placed on record, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner, at this stage of trial, can be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, one of whom shall be a permanent resident of the area of jurisdiction of the learned Trial Court, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The bail shall further be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Trial Court without prior written permission
6. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant