Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./2670/2026 of ABDUS SALAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010196562026 2026:GAU-AS:14902 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2670/2026 ABDUS SALAM S/O MUKHED ALI, RESIDENT OF BHOUKAMARI, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010196562026

2026:GAU-AS:14902

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./2670/2026

ABDUS SALAM

S/O MUKHED ALI, RESIDENT OF BHOUKAMARI, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT

BARPETA, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

2:SUSHEN RAJKUMAR

S/O BONOMALI RAJKUMAR

R/O BONDA COLONY

P.S. PRAGJYOTISHPUR

DISTRICT KAMRUP (METRO)

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. A E HUSSAIN,MR. S HAQUE

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. S NEWAR(R2)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

06.10.2026 Heard Mr. S. M. Abdullah. P., learned counsel for the accused and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Also heard Ms. S. Newar, learned Page No.# 2/2 Amicus Curiae for the respondent No. 2.

2. Mr. B. Sarma, learned APP, submits that though he was directed to produce the case diary before this Court, yet, as per his instruction, the I.O. has completed investigation and submitted charge-sheet, being Charge-sheet No. 99/2026, dated 30.09.2026.

3. At this stage, Mr. Abdullah, learned counsel for the accused submits that since charge-sheet has already been submitted in this matter, this petition may be closed, by granting liberty to the accused to approach the learned Trial Court.

4. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of the learned counsels for both the parties, this Court is inclined to close this petition, by directing the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court by filing appropriate petition. And on such application being filed, the learned Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law.

5. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead