Gauhati High Court

AB/1804/2026 of DEBOBROT ALIAS DEBOBRAT BORBORUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010163062026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1804/2026 DEBOBROT ALIAS DEBABRAT BORBORUAH S/O- DIJEN BORBORUAH VILL- BOHUPATHAR, P.S.- BIHPURIA, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP,

GAHC010163062026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1804/2026

DEBOBROT ALIAS DEBABRAT BORBORUAH

S/O- DIJEN BORBORUAH

VILL- BOHUPATHAR, P.S.- BIHPURIA, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

2:PROTIMA CHETRIYA (INFORMANT)

W/O BANAMALI CHETRIYA

VILL- 2 NO. SIMULGURI

P.S. BIHPURIA

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, M. HOSSAIN,MR. SAYED SALIM

AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR A KHANIKAR(R2)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 06.10.2026

Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam as well as Mr. A. Khanikar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.

2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 challenging in respect of Special (POCSO) Case No.44/2025 pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur.

3. The petitioner Debobrot @ Debabrat Borboruah has been shown the petitioner has been shown as an absconder in the charge sheet. He now apprehends that if he appears before the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, he will be remanded to judicial custody because this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain his bail application.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner should be given adequate opportunities to contest the case before the trial court.

5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

6. This Court is of the opinion that since the petitioner wants to contest the case, he should be given adequate opportunities to that effect. Therefore, his bail application is allowed.

7. The petitioner Debobrot @ Debabrat Borboruah is directed to appear before the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No.44/2025 on 14th October 226. On his appearance, he shall be released on bail of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur.

8. The petitioner shall appear regularly on each and every date of hearing. If he fails to do so, the trial court shall have the liberty to procure his attendance in accordance with the procedures as laid down by law.

9. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead