Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5448/2026 of MS SAGARIKA REGENCY AND ANOTHER Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS on 4 October 2026
GAHC010217722026 2026:GAU-AS:14869 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5448/2026 MS SAGARIKA REGENCY AND ANOTHER HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT SHILLONGPATTY, SILCHAR, CACHAR, BEARING ESTABLISHMENT ID/LIN NO. NEGHY2149508000,
GAHC010217722026
2026:GAU-AS:14869
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5448/2026
MS SAGARIKA REGENCY AND ANOTHER
HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT SHILLONGPATTY, SILCHAR, CACHAR, BEARING ESTABLISHMENT ID/LIN NO. NEGHY2149508000, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DULY AUTHORISED MANAGING
DIRECTOR/PROPRIETOR, MR. BISWAJIT ROY.SON OF LATE RAKESH ROY, RESIDENT OF APANJANPALLY, P.O. AND P.S.SILHAR, CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788001.
2: BISWAJIT ROY
SON OF LATE RAKESH ROY
ADDRESS- APANJAN PALLY
P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR
CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788001
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI- 110001.
2:THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER /ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER PROVIDENT FUND
EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
REGIONAL OFFICE
GUWAHATI
G.S. ROAD
NEAR BHARALU BRIDGE
BHANGAGARH
ASSAM
PIN 781005.
3:THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
DISTRICT OFFICE SILCHAR
3RD FLOOR
SILCHAR MUNICIPAL OFFICE BUILDING
SADARGHAT ROAD
CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788005
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. M.A. Barbhuiya, Advocate Advocate for the respondent(s):
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
05.10.2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that taking into account that the proceedings are pending before the Enforcement Officer, EPF Organization, the petitioner would not like to press the instant proceedings without prejudice.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. It is observed that withdrawal of the instant proceeding shall not prejudice the petitioner in the proceedings pending before the
Enforcement Officer of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization. JUDGE Comparing Assistant