Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/362/2026 of M/S UTSHAV COMMERCIAL Vs HARMEET SINGH, IPS on 4 October 2026
GAHC010132992026 2026:GAU-AS:14871 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/362/2026 M/S UTSHAV COMMERCIAL REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI AJAY KUMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA SINGH, R/O SWASTIK VILLA,
GAHC010132992026
2026:GAU-AS:14871
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/362/2026
M/S UTSHAV COMMERCIAL
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI AJAY KUMAR SINGH, AGED
ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA SINGH, R/O SWASTIK VILLA, HOUSE NO. 43, A.P.R.O. LANE, B.K. KAKATI ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, P.O.- ULUBARI, P.S.- PALTANBAZAR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN
CODE- 781007
VERSUS
HARMEET SINGH, IPS
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ASSAM, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, P.O.- ULUBARI, P.S.- PALTANBAZAR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN CODE- 781007
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. R Sahiinii, Advocate (for Mr. D. Nath, Sr. GA, Assam)
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
05.10.2026 This is an application filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 10.12.2025 passed in WP(C) 6113/2023, wherein, this Court had directed the respondent authorities to pay an amount of Rs.10,87,398/- within a period of 6 (six) months from the date the certified copy of the order was served upon the Director General of Police, Assam.
2. It is seen that out of the amount of Rs.10,87,398/-, an amount of Rs.5,04,949/- had already been disbursed prior to 14.08.2026. Subsequent thereto, a further amount of Rs.5,61,915/- have already been disbursed to the petitioner and credited to the petitioner’s account on 18.09.2026.
3. The said instructions which has been placed dated 29.09.2026 is kept on record and marked with the letter “X” .
4. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains in the contempt proceeding, for which the contempt proceedings stands dropped.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant