Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3111/2026 of JYOTIRMOY BARMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 4 October 2026
GAHC010220782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3111/2026 JYOTIRMOY BARMAN S/O- ASWINI KUMAR BARMAN, R/O-HOUSE NO. 12, JANAPATH, KHANAPARA P.S.- DISPUR DIST KAMRUPM, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010220782026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3111/2026
JYOTIRMOY BARMAN
S/O- ASWINI KUMAR BARMAN, R/O-HOUSE NO. 12, JANAPATH, KHANAPARA P.S.- DISPUR DIST KAMRUPM, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. J JAKARIA,MR. MD IMDAD,MD
IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.10.2026 Heard Mr. S. M. Abdullah, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Begum, the learned APP for the State.
2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 317 of 2026, registered under Section 296(a) 118, 324
(4) (5), 109 (1), 351 (3), as well as 3(5) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 19-08-2026, was lodged by the victim himself stating inter alia that, while he was going towards a cafe, the petitioner, along with others approached him in a group and assaulted him.
3. It was also alleged that, the petitioner along with another assaulted the victim with a steel iron chair on his head and body. The informant also stated that, he had sustained injuries on his head and other parts of the body and had also suffered a fracture on his right hand. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has been inside the jail for the last 48 days and only on the grounds of prolonged incarceration, this Court may release him on bail.
4. On the other hand, Ms. A. Begum learned APP for the State, submits that, clear allegation is made against the petitioner who was stated to have assaulted the victim along with others, as a result of which, the victim sustained various injuries and as such, she submits that, the case diary be called for.
5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact, that the petitioner is a student and is of 21 years of age and he has also been inside the jail for the last 48 days, this Court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) only with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M, Kamrup (M) under the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall positively appear before the I.O. and the Trial Court as and when call for.
(ii) The petitioners shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; and
(iii) The petitioners shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer.
6. The Bail Applications stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant