Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5449/2026 of BASIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 4 October 2026
GAHC010221312026 2026:GAU-AS:14872 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5449/2026 BASIRUL ISLAM SON OF - LATE NAZIM UDDIN AHMED. VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE- JOYBHUM, POLICE STATION- LAKHIPUR, DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM, PIN- 783129
GAHC010221312026
2026:GAU-AS:14872
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5449/2026
BASIRUL ISLAM
SON OF- LATE NAZIM UDDIN AHMED. VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE- JOYBHUM, POLICE STATION- LAKHIPUR, DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM, PIN- 783129
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVERNMENT
OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI
-781006
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ASSAM WATER CENTER
5TH FLOOR
BASISHTHA CHARIALI
GUWAHATI -781029
3:THE TENDER SELECTION COMMITTEE
C/O- THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
ASSAM WATER CENTER
5TH FLOOR
BASISHTHA CHARIALI
GUWAHATI -781029
4:ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER
LOWER ASSAM ZONE
BASISTHA
GUWAHAT-781029.
5:SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
LOWER ASSAM W.R. CIRCLE
BONGAIGAON-783380.
6:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GOALPARA W.R. DIVISION.
GOALTOLI
GOALPARA-783101
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. H. Laskar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. R. Deka, Standing Counsel BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 05.10.2026
Heard Mr. N. H. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Ms. R. Deka, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Water Resources Department.
2. Mr. N. H. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice to the rights of the Petitioner to submit his bid to the Notice Inviting Tender dated 19.09.2026 which was published on 23.09.2026. He further submitted that the Performance Security which is lying with the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, which was duly submitted, be returned to the Petitioner.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. It is observed that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not affect the rights of the Petitioner to submit his bid in pursuance to the Notice Inviting Tender dated 19.09.2026 which was published on 23.09.2026.
5. Further to that, it is observed that taking into account that the Letter of Acceptance dated 25.02.2026 has been cancelled, the Respondent Water Resources Department shall return the Performance Security so submitted, if not yet returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant