Gauhati High Court
AB/1895/2026 of MD SHEHZAD RAJA KHAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 4 October 2026
GAHC010170642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1895/2026 MD SHEHZAD RAJA KHAN S/O SEHZADA AFTAB KHAN R/O - HOUSE NO. 8, FAKHRUDDIN ALI AHMED ROAD, SIX MILE, P.S. DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010170642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1895/2026
MD SHEHZAD RAJA KHAN
S/O SEHZADA AFTAB KHAN
R/O - HOUSE NO. 8, FAKHRUDDIN ALI AHMED ROAD, SIX MILE, P.S.
DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:Anowar Khan
Resident of H/ No.8
Six Mile
Aziz Nagar
P.O.- Six Mile
P.S - Dispur
Guwahati- 78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. A CHAMUAH, Y N MAHANTA,MS N SHARMA,MRS. K
BARPUZARI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S R ISLAM(R2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
05.10.2026
Heard Dr. Ashim Chamuah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State Respondent/respondent no. 1 and Mr. O. Farook, learned counsel representing the informant/respondent no. 2. By this application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS,2023 the petitioner Md. Shehzad Raja Khan has prayed for pre-arrest bail, who apprehends arrest in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 420/2026. The petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court on 18.08.2026 and in pursuant to the said interim order, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has been cooperating in the investigation. In view of the above and considering entire aspect of the matter, more particularly, the petitioner has been cooperating in the investigation, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner aforesaid does not deserve to be detained in custody. Hence, the interim order dated 18.08.2026 passed by this Court is made absolute. The bail application is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant