Gauhati High Court

CRP(IO)/106/2024 of SIBARAN NESSA Vs AYNAL HOQUE AND 2 ORS on 4 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010057482024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/106/2024 SIBARAN NESSA W/O- NUR ISLAM, R/O- VILL.- DAWAGURI, P.O. BAGARGAON, P.S. BIJNI, DIST. CHIRANG, BTR, ASSAM VERSUS AYNAL HOQUE AND 2 ORS S/O- LATE SONGSHER ALI, R/O-

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010057482024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : CRP(IO)/106/2024

SIBARAN NESSA

W/O- NUR ISLAM, R/O- VILL.- DAWAGURI, P.O. BAGARGAON, P.S. BIJNI, DIST. CHIRANG, BTR, ASSAM

VERSUS

AYNAL HOQUE AND 2 ORS

S/O- LATE SONGSHER ALI, R/O- VILL.- DAWAGURI, P.O. BONGAIGAON, P.S.

BIJNI, DIST. CHIRANG, B.T.R., ASSAM, PIN-783390.

2:MAYAN ALI

S/O- LATE SONGSHER ALI

R/O- VILL.- DAWAGURI

P.O. BONGAIGAON

P.S. BIJNI

DIST. CHIRANG

B.T.R.

ASSAM, PIN-783390.

3:JAYAN ALI

S/O- LATE SONGSHER ALI

R/O- VILL.- DAWAGURI

P.O. BONGAIGAON

P.S. BIJNI

DIST. CHIRANG

B.T.R.

ASSAM, PIN-783390

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R CHOUDHURY, MS. B. HAZARIKA,MRS. S ROY

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. J ABBAS(R1,2,3), MS. FARJINA AJMI(R1,2,3),SK

ABDULLAH(R1,2,3)

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 05.10.2026

1. Heard Ms. R. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Z. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J. Abbas, learned counsel for the respondents who submits that this CRP(IO) has become infructuous as the Misc.(J) Case in which the impugned order was passed has already been disposed of by the Trial Court on 30.04.2026. In support of his submission, he has furnished a copy of the order by which the said Misc.(J) Case was dismissed on contest.

2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner, after taking instructions from the petitioner, submits that the Misc.(J) Case has intended been disposed of by the Trial Court. As such, this CRP(IO) has become infructuous.

3. In view of the submissions made at bar and in view of the fact that the Misc.(J) Case No. 6/2024, pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bijni, has been dismissed on contest on 30.04.2026, this CRP(IO) has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, this CRP(IO) is dismissed on becoming infructuous.

5. The stay order granted in this CRP(IO) on 18.03.2024 hereby stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead