Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5314/2026 of SAHAB UDDIN LASKAR ALIAS SHAHAB UDDIN LASKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010210292026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5314/2026 SAHAB UDDIN LASKAR ALIAS SHAHAB UDDIN LASKAR S/O LATE MATIN ALI LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE VICHINGA PART I, P.O VICHINGA, P.S HAILAKANDI, DISTRICT
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010210292026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5314/2026
SAHAB UDDIN LASKAR ALIAS SHAHAB UDDIN LASKAR
S/O LATE MATIN ALI LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE VICHINGA PART I, P.O VICHINGA, P.S HAILAKANDI, DISTRICT HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN
788155
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI
781006.
2:THE LEGAL REMEMBRANCER (L.R) AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION
ASSAM
POLICE HEADQUARTERS
1ST FLOOR
B.K KAKATI ROAD
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781007.
4:THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
HAILAKANDI
ASSAM, PIN 78815
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K HANNAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2
Page 1 of 2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
30.09.2026 Heard Shri M. Dutta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri A. K. Hannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. D. Das Barman, learned State Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is aggrieved by a notification dated 02.09.2026 whereby his services as Special Public Prosecutor, POCSO at the Hailakandi district has been terminated. The petitioner was appointed in the said capacity on 03.10.2023. After some deliberation, the learned Senior Counsel upon instructions submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the challenge. However, an anxiety has been expressed regarding any stigma which may be attached by the impugned order. On a bare perusal of the impugned notification, it clearly appears that the termination is simpliciter which should not be construed to be stigmatic for any future purpose. With those observations, the writ petition is closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…