Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/885/2026 of NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD Vs GANESH NATH AND ORS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010066932023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/885/2026 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD FORT MUMBAI 400001 AND
GAHC010066932023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/885/2026
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE
BUILDING 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD FORT MUMBAI 400001 AND
REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD GUWAHATI 5 REPRESENTED BY THE
CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER
VERSUS
GANESH NATH AND ORS
SON OF SRI BIREN NATH HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND REP.
1.1:SMTI RAJU NATH
MOTHER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
1.2:SRI RUBUL NATH
BROTHER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
1.3:SRI KANAK NATH
BROTHER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
1.4:SRI JUGAL NATH
BROTHER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
1.5:SRI LILA NATH
SISTER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
1.6:ALAKA NATH
SISTER OF LATE GANESH NATH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALIJULI NATHPARA PS CHAYGAON DISTRICT
KAMRUP ASSAM
2:AMIR KR JHA
SON OF LATE SHIBNANDAN JHA RESIDENT OF NABIN NAGAR BASISTHA
ROAD H NO 17 BELTOLA GUWAHATI 29
3:SRI CHITRA DAS
SON OF LATE HARESWAR DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR PS
PALASHBARI KAMRUP
------------
Advocate for : MR SISHIR DUTTA
Advocate for : appearing for GANESH NATH AND ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 367 days of delay in preferring the substitution petition.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that he has no objection if the delay is condoned.
4. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned.
5. The I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant