Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5296/2026 of SAROJINI RAY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 29 September 2026
GAHC010207642026 2026:GAU-AS:14622 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5296/2026 SAROJINI RAY W/O - RATNESWAR RAY R/O- DOLAIGAON (MAJPARA) P.O.AND P.S. - BONAGAIGAON. DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN-783380. VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010207642026
2026:GAU-AS:14622
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5296/2026
SAROJINI RAY
W/O - RATNESWAR RAY R/O- DOLAIGAON (MAJPARA) P.O.AND P.S. - BONAGAIGAON. DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN-783380.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, JANATA
BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM - 781001.
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (DGP)
ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST KAMRUPM
ASSAM.
3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION)
ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BONGAIGAION
BONGAIGAION. DISTRICT BONGAIGAON
ASSAM.
5:THE MOTOR TRANSPORT OFFICER (MTO)
POLICE RESERVE
Page No.# 2/2
DIST BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Sarkar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.09.2026
Mr. N. Sarkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition in view of a formal defect, on account of non-impleadment of the District Commissioner. The learned counsel further submitted that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition after removing the said formal defect.
2. Considering the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition after removing the aforesaid formal defect.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant